A possible solution to a long-standing riddle in materials science
All ferroelectric materials possess a property known as piezoelectricity in which an applied mechanical force can generate an electrical current and an applied electrical field can elicit a mechanical response. Ferroelectric materials are used in a wide variety of industrial applications, from ultrasound and sonar to capacitors, transducers, vibration sensors, and ultrasensitive infrared cameras. Now, an international team of scientists led by Penn State may have solved the 30-year-old riddle of why certain ferroelectric crystals exhibit extremely strong piezoelectric responses.
In 1997, a relaxor-ferroelectric solid solution crystal with the highest known piezoelectric response was reported at Penn State by Thomas R. Shrout, currently a senior scientist and professor of materials science and engineering at Penn State, and the late Seung-Eek Park. It has a piezoelectric response five to ten times higher than any other known ferroelectric material.
“There have been a number of mechanisms proposed to explain its ultrahigh piezoelectric responses, but none of them offer a satisfactory explanation for all the experimental observations and measurements associated with the high response. Without a firm understanding of the underlying mechanism, it would be difficult to design new materials with an even higher piezoelectric response,” said Fei Li, a postdoctoral scholar in materials science and engineering at Penn State and lead author of a recent article in the journal Nature Communications attempting to explain the phenomenon.
However, the scientific community has reached a general consensus that something called polar nanoregions contributed to the high piezoresponse of relaxor crystals, Li said.
A polar nanoregion is a spatial region within a crystal. It has a nanoscale size (5-10 nm) and possesses a net electric polarization. There are many such tiny regions randomly distributed in space in a relaxor crystal. Other well-known piezoelectric materials, like lead zirconate titanate (PZT), do not have polar nanoregions, but instead, have much larger ferroelectric domains in which the polarization is uniform. The team set out to prove that the polar nanoregions were indeed responsible for the huge responses, and more importantly, to determine the mechanism by which they help to generate such huge responses.
The experiments were carried out at ultralow cryogenic temperatures (50-150 K). This enabled the researchers to separate the responses from the polar nanoregions, which remain active within that temperature range, from those high piezoelectric responses that typically takes place near a ferroelectric phase transition.
Do You Know
Western California blackout that occurred in 2011 that left nearly seven million people without power for up to 11 hours. It is believed to have been triggered by 23 distinct events that occurred on five separate power grids in a span of 11 minutes.